分类筛选
分类筛选:

关于盆底论文范文资料 与不同分娩方式对产后盆底功能影响康复治疗效果分析有关论文参考文献

版权:原创标记原创 主题:盆底范文 科目:毕业论文 2024-02-05

《不同分娩方式对产后盆底功能影响康复治疗效果分析》:此文是一篇盆底论文范文,为你的毕业论文写作提供有价值的参考。

DOI:10.16662/j.cnki.1674-0742.2017.11.014

[摘 要] 目的 對不同分娩方式对产后盆底功能影响及康复治疗的效果进行详细探究.方法 随机选取该院2014年6月—2015年6月收治的106例有盆底功能障碍的产妇作为该次研究对象,在106例患者中,53例患者为顺产产妇为对照组,另外53例患者为剖腹产产妇,将其作为观察组.对于所有产妇,产后8周对其进行复查,并采用生物反馈和电刺激治疗法以及盆底肌功能练习治疗法.采用护垫实验法对产妇压力性尿失禁进行判定,并采用传统临床分度法对患者盆腔器官脱垂程度进行判定.结果 对照组产妇中,有10例发生尿失禁,发生率为18.9%,观察组产妇中,有9例发生尿失禁,发生率为17.0%,两组患者压力性尿失禁发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).对照组患者康复治疗后盆底肌力评分为(3.8±0.9)分,观察组患者康复治疗后盆底肌力评分为(3.1±1.2)分,对照组患者康复治疗后盆底肌力评分高于观察组患者,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 剖宫产对盆底肌层综合肌力受损影响无意义,因此认为剖宫产避免盆底功能障碍性疾病发生是不可取的,康复治疗是促进产妇盆底肌力恢复的有效措施,对提高女性生活质量有重要意义,值得临床推广应用.

[关键词] 不同分娩方式;产后盆底功能;康复治疗

[中图分类号] R71 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)04(b)-0014-03

Analysis of Effect of Different Delivery Methods on the Pelvic Function after Delivery and Rehabilitation Treatment Effect

GOU Ling-hui

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Maternal and Child Health Hospital Family Planning Service Center of Shangpingba District, Chongqing, 400000 China

[Abstract] Objective To study the effect of different delivery methods on the pelvic function after delivery and rehabilitation treatment effect. Methods 106 cases of A basin of dysfunctional maternal admitted and treated in our hospital from June 2014 to June 2015 were randomly selected and divided into two groups with 53 cases in each, the control group were the delivery women with natural labor, while the observation group were the delivery women with cesarean delivery, and all of them were reexamined after 8-week delivery, and the patients were given the biological feedback, electric stimulation treatment method and ?pelvic floor muscle function exercise treatment method, and the stress incontinence of delivery women was determined by the protection pad experimental method, and the pelvic organ prolapse degree of patients was determined by the traditional clinical classification method. Results In the control group, there were 10 cases with urinary incontinence and the incidence rate was 18.9%, in the observation group, there were 9 cases with urinary incontinence and the incidence rate was 17.0%, and there was no obvious difference in the urinary incontinence between the two groups(P>0.05), after the rehabilitation treatment, the pelvic muscle force in the control group and in the observation group was respectively(3.8±0.9)points and (3.1±1.2)points, and the pelvic muscle force score was higher than that in the observation group, and the difference between groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of cesarean delivery on the impairment of pelvic floor muscle is of no significance, therefore, it is not proper to use the cesarean delivery to avoid the occurrence of pelvic floor dysfunctional diseases, and the rehabilitation treatment is an effective measure of promoting the recovery of pelvic muscle force of delivery women, and it is of important significance to improving the quality of life of females, which is worth clinical promotion and application.

盆底论文参考资料:

结论:不同分娩方式对产后盆底功能影响康复治疗效果分析为适合盆底论文写作的大学硕士及相关本科毕业论文,相关盆底肌修复的最佳时期开题报告范文和学术职称论文参考文献下载。

热门有关优秀论文题目选题

和你相关的