原创《争论派和压制派放大优点让人生更精彩》：本论文为免费优秀的关于压制论文范文资料，可用于相关论文写作参考。
Wranglers and Stranglers
By Ted Engstrom
Years ago, a group of brilliant young men at the University of Wisconsin seemed to have amazing creative literary talent. They were would?-be poets, novelists and essayists. They were extraordinary in their ability to put the English language to its best use. These promising young men met regularly to read and critique each other’s work. And critique it they did！
These men were merciless with one another. They dissected the most minute literary expression into a hundred pieces. They were heartless, tough, even mean in their criticism. The sessions became such arenas of literary criticism that the members of this special club called themselves the “Stranglers ”.
Not to be outdone, the women of literary talent in the university were determined to start a club of their own, one comparable to the Stranglers. They called themselves the “Wranglers”.They, too, read their works to one another. But there was one great difference. The criticism was much softer, more encouraging. Sometimes, there was almost no criticism at all. Every effort, even the weakest one, was encouraged.
Twenty years later, when an alumnus of the university was making an exhaustive study of his classmates’ careers, he noticed a vast difference in the literary accomplishments of the Stranglers as opposed to the Wranglers. Of all the bright young men in the Stranglers, no one had made a significant literary accomplishment of any kind. From the Wranglers had come six or more successful writers, some of national renown, such as Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings, who wrote “The Yearling”.
Talent between the two? Probably the same. Level of education? Not much difference. But the Stranglers strangled, while the Wranglers were determined to give each other a life. The Stranglers promoted an atmosphere of argument and self?-doubt. The Wranglers highlighted the best, not the worst.
多年以前,威斯康星大学的一群才华横溢的年轻人,表现出惊人的文学天赋.他们可能是未来的诗人、小说家、评论家.他们有非凡的能力,将英语发挥到最好水平.这些前程远大的年轻人定时地相聚,互相阅读、批评彼此的作品.他们做的是批判性的讨论！
这些人彼此毫不留情.他们把最微小的文学表达分割成一百多个碎片.他们的批评无情、粗暴甚至带有恶意.聚会成了文学批判的竞技场,这个排他的俱乐部成员们都自称“压制派”.
因为不想让别人超过自己,这所大学里一些有文学天赋的女性决定,组织成一个比得上“压制派”的俱乐部,他她们称自己为“争论派”.同样,她们阅读彼此的作品,但有一个重大的区别,——她们的批评更加柔和、肯定,更多地起着激励的作用.有时,几乎完全没有批评.每一点努力,哪怕再弱,都受到了鼓励.
20年后,一位校友对学长们的事业作了一份详尽的调查.他注意到争论派和压制派的文学成就差异巨大.属于压制派的所有聪明的年轻人中,没有一人取得任何重大的文学成就.,而在争论派中,有六个以上成为了成功的作家,有一些闻名全国,.比如,马乔里·基纳·罗林斯,她曾写过《鹿苑长春》.
两者的天赋大致相同,他们受的教育的程度没有太大的差别.但是,压制派的天赋被相互扼杀窒息了,而争论派决心给彼此成长的机会.压制派吹毛求疵、自我怀疑；争论派放大优点、忽略不足.
压制论文参考资料：
结论：争论派和压制派放大优点让人生更精彩为关于压制方面的论文题目、论文提纲、压制你的人论文开题报告、文献综述、参考文献的相关大学硕士和本科毕业论文。
